#Roger moore series#

“If I had to take someone new and establish them in the role, it would have been quite difficult for me, I think.” “As it happened, I was very pleased that Roger did it, because it helped me enormously in the fact that he was an established James Bond,” the director said in the “making-of” documentary on the Eyes Blu-ray. Glen for one was glad to have the dapper Moore back. In the end, Moore did come back for Eyes, although his contract was not completed until well into production. Following the completion of that film, rumors surfaced that Moore was ready to retire from the role, leading 007 production company Eon Productions and producer Albert “Cubby” Broccoli to begin the search for a new Bond.īut Moore himself suggested that he wanted to continue in the role, and that the highly publicized audition process was all part of the negotiations to bring him back.īut that’s another story. Roger Moore’s original contract was for three films, with his participation going on a film-by-film basis starting with Moonraker. He received that promotion after working on several previous installments as a second unit director.īut Eyes was also meant, at one point, to usher in the most important change in any Bond movie: the introduction of a new actor in the role of 007. By contrast Eyes seemed stripped down and also marked the debut of John Glen in the director’s chair-a position he would hold for a series-most five entries.

#Roger moore series#

Released in 1981, this 12th entry in the long-running series, and Roger Moore’s fifth outing as the man in the tuxedo, was deliberately styled as a return to the 007’s roots after he went to space in the over-the-top Moonraker (1979): the one where series producers did their best to compete with Star Wars.

For Your Eyes Only, which celebrates its 40th anniversary this week, was a transitional James Bond film.